Sat, 13 Sept 2025, 09:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
41'
Normal Goal → Y. Hashimoto
54'
Normal Goal → Thiago Andrade
56'
Substitution 1 → M. Yuzawa
60'
Substitution 1 → S. Tanaka
64'
Normal Goal
66'
Substitution 2 → K. Konno
66'
Substitution 3 → Wellington
73'
Substitution 2 → Rafael Ratao
77'
Normal Goal → Thiago Andrade
82'
Goal cancelled
83'
Substitution 4 → M. Tashiro
83'
Substitution 5 → N. Ben Khalifa
84'
Substitution 3 → R. Shindo
84'
Substitution 4 → H. Kida
84'
Substitution 5 → S. Homma
89'
Normal Goal
90'
Normal Goal → S. Nago
90+4'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
6Shots on Goal9
4Shots off Goal7
18Total Shots17
8Blocked Shots1
12Shots insidebox11
6Shots outsidebox6
14Fouls6
8Corner Kicks4
2Offsides2
49Ball Possession51
1Yellow Cards0
5Goalkeeper Saves1
382Total passes414
320Passes accurate351
84Passes %85
1.87expected_goals3.38
Starting Lineups
Avispa Fukuoka1:1
Starting XI
24Y. ObataG
77T. ShichiD
47Y. HashimotoM
22K. FujimotoF
9S. ZahediF
3T. NaraD
11T. MikiM
14S. NagoF
5T. KamijimaD
6M. ShigemiM
16I. OdaM
Cerezo Osaka1:1
Starting XI
1K. FukuiG
66A. OhataD
35K. YoshinoM
11Thiago AndradeM
13M. NakajimaF
44S. HatanakaD
8S. KagawaM
48M. ShibayamaM
31R. InoueD
77L. FernandesM
27D. CoolsD
Head-to-Head
6
Wins
4
Draws
5
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Avispa Fukuoka
Form: L-D-D-W-D
Cerezo Osaka
Form: D-D-L-W-L
Record
2 W
7 D
1 L
•
3 W
4 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
1.4
Scored
vs
1.5
Scored
1.1
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.0
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:1.4
Scored
Home:1.5
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:2.5
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1534
Average
1586
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1555
↑ Momentum (+21)
1612
↑ Momentum (+26)
Expected Outcome
29%
Home Win
32%
Draw
39%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1414
Attack
1508
1607
Defence
1524
Recent Form
1416
Attack
1529
1614
Defence
1498
Post-Match Changes
-14
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

