Sat, 27 Sept 2025, 09:00
Full Time

Match Timeline

17'
V. Germain
Normal Goal → M. Kato
46'
N. Arai🔄
Substitution 1 → S. Nakano
62'
N. Maeda🔄
Substitution 2 → T. Shiotani
62'
V. Germain🔄
Substitution 3 → K. Kinoshita
70'
N. Ben Khalifa🔄
Substitution 1 → S. Zahedi
71'
M. Yuzawa🔄
Substitution 2 → Y. Iwasaki
71'
D. Suga🔄
Substitution 4 → S. Higashi
78'
M. Kato🔄
Substitution 5 → T. Arslan
86'
S. Tanaka
Normal Goal → K. Kinoshita
87'
M. Tashiro🔄
Substitution 3 → A. Sani Brown
90'
A. Sani Brown
Normal Goal → Y. Hashimoto

Match Statistics

8Shots on Goal5
9Shots off Goal7
20Total Shots17
3Blocked Shots5
14Shots insidebox13
6Shots outsidebox4
7Fouls8
4Corner Kicks6
2Offsides1
40Ball Possession60
3Goalkeeper Saves6
396Total passes592
323Passes accurate497
82Passes %84
2.58expected_goals2.08

Starting Lineups

Avispa FukuokaAvispa Fukuoka1:1

Starting XI

24Y. ObataG
20T. AndoD
47Y. HashimotoM
14S. NagoF
13N. Ben KhalifaF
3T. NaraD
11T. MikiM
8K. KonnoF
37M. TashiroD
88D. MatsuokaM
2M. YuzawaM

Sanfrecce HiroshimaSanfrecce Hiroshima1:1

Starting XI

1K. OsakoG
37Kim Ju-SungD
18D. SugaM
51M. KatoF
98V. GermainF
3T. YamasakiD
14S. TanakaM
41N. MaedaF
19S. SasakiD
35Y. NakajimaM
13N. AraiM

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Avispa Fukuoka
Avispa Fukuoka
Form: L-L-L-L-D
Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Form: D-W-D-W-L
Record
1 W
5 D
4 L
5 W
3 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
1.3
Scored
vs
1.8
Scored
1.6
Conceded
vs
0.9
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
40%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.3
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:2.0
Away:1.4
Scored
Home:1.5
Away:2.0
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:1.0

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1520
Average
1609
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1518
↓ Momentum (-2)
1590
↓ Momentum (-19)
Expected Outcome
26%
Home Win
30%
Draw
44%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1423
Attack
1506
1579
Defence
1658
Recent Form
1430
Attack
1455
1555
Defence
1704
Post-Match Changes
-10
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.