Wed, 16 Jul 2025, 23:30
Full Time
Match Timeline
16'
G. Valenzuela⚽Normal Goal → L. Orellano
25'
O. Ustari🔄Substitution 1 → R. Rios
50'
Evander⚽Normal Goal
62'
K. Kamara🔄Substitution 1 → T. Hadebe
70'
Evander⚽Normal Goal
72'
T. Allende🔄Substitution 2 → F. Picault
72'
M. Falcon🔄Substitution 3 → G. Lujan
77'
G. Valenzuela🔄Substitution 2 → Sergio Santos
77'
L. Orellano🔄Substitution 3 → C. Baird
81'
Teenage Hadebe🟨Yellow Card
85'
L. Engel🔄Substitution 4 → B. Smith
85'
D. Yedlin🔄Substitution 5 → A. Powell
86'
M. Weigandt🔄Substitution 4 → Y. Bright
Match Statistics
6Shots on Goal2
5Shots off Goal5
11Total Shots10
0Blocked Shots3
6Shots insidebox6
5Shots outsidebox4
6Fouls9
1Corner Kicks4
0Offsides2
44Ball Possession56
1Yellow Cards0
2Goalkeeper Saves3
475Total passes593
403Passes accurate509
85Passes %86
1.33expected_goals0.95
0goals_prevented0
Starting Lineups
FC Cincinnati1:1
Starting XI
18R. CelentanoG
29L. EngelD
23L. OrellanoM
10EvanderF
22G. ValenzuelaF
21M. MiazgaD
27T. AnungaM
85K. KamaraF
12M. RobinsonD
20P. BuchaM
91D. YedlinM
Inter Miami1:1
Starting XI
19O. UstariG
18J. AlbaD
8T. SegoviaM
9L. SuarezF
37M. FalconD
5S. BusquetsM
10L. MessiF
6T. AvilesD
30B. CremaschiM
57M. WeigandtD
21T. AllendeM
Head-to-Head
5
Wins
3
Draws
7
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
FC Cincinnati
Form: L-W-W-W-W
Inter Miami
Form: W-W-W-L-D
Record
5 W
2 D
3 L
•
6 W
3 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
1.8
Scored
vs
2.4
Scored
1.7
Conceded
vs
1.6
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
80%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:1.7
Conceded
Home:2.5
Away:1.2
Scored
Home:3.0
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:1.8
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1530
Average
1591
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1541
↑ Momentum (+11)
1645
↑ Momentum (+54)
Expected Outcome
28%
Home Win
32%
Draw
40%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1512
Attack
1613
1514
Defence
1492
Recent Form
1520
Attack
1660
1499
Defence
1484
Post-Match Changes
+14
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.