Sat, 26 Jul 2025, 11:00
Super League
China
Full Time
Match Timeline
23'
Yellow Card
36'
Penalty confirmed
38'
Yellow Card
45'
Normal Goal
57'
Substitution 1 → Duan Liuyu
57'
Substitution 2 → N. Da Luz
60'
Normal Goal → Duan Liuyu
62'
Penalty
67'
Substitution 1 → X. Li
72'
Substitution 2 → Li Shuai
72'
Substitution 3 → Kuai Jiwen
81'
Substitution 3 → Ding Haifeng
81'
Substitution 4 → Gao Di
86'
Normal Goal → Ding Haifeng
88'
Substitution 5 → X. Zhang
89'
Substitution 4 → Xu Xin
90'
Substitution 5 → Feng Jing
90+11'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
5Shots on Goal3
5Shots off Goal6
14Total Shots11
4Blocked Shots2
9Shots insidebox6
5Shots outsidebox5
9Fouls17
6Corner Kicks2
3Offsides2
66Ball Possession34
1Yellow Cards2
1Goalkeeper Saves2
579Total passes303
488Passes accurate218
84Passes %72
3.16expected_goals1.48
Starting Lineups
SHANGHAI SIPG1:1
Starting XI
1Yan JunlingG
4Wang ShenchaoD
10Mateus VitalM
30GabrielzinhoM
45LeonardoF
5Zhang LinpengD
22Matheus JussaM
21O. MelendoM
3Browning TyiasD
26Liu RuofanM
40Yusup UmidjanD
Qingdao Youth Island1:1
Starting XI
1H. Li1:1
20He LonghaiD
28Zhang ChengdongM
11DavidsonM
9A. YakubuF
15Wang Peng2:2
6Xu BinM
23Matheus IndioM
5RiccieliD
21M. IminqariM
22A. YangD
Head-to-Head
0
Wins
2
Draws
3
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
SHANGHAI SIPG
Form: W-W-W-L-W
Qingdao Youth Island
Form: D-D-W-L-W
Record
7 W
2 D
1 L
•
3 W
4 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
2.7
Scored
vs
0.8
Scored
1.2
Conceded
vs
0.9
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
40%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
30%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.3
Away:3.0
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.2
Scored
Home:0.7
Away:0.9
Conceded
Home:0.3
Away:1.1
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1735
Good
1536
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1782
↑ Momentum (+46)
1592
↑ Momentum (+57)
Expected Outcome
57%
Home Win
25%
Draw
18%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1682
Attack
1520
1629
Defence
1557
Recent Form
1712
Attack
1522
1638
Defence
1616
Post-Match Changes
-8
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

