Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:00
Allsvenskan
Sweden
Full Time
Match Timeline
-5'
Yellow Card
9'
Normal Goal → O. Berg
35'
Yellow Card
48'
Yellow Card
70'
Substitution 1 → V. Gustafson
70'
Substitution 2 → T. Stavitski
70'
Substitution 3 → T. Pettersson
73'
Normal Goal → T. Stavitski
74'
Substitution 1 → O. Lewicki
74'
Substitution 2 → Z. Loukili
79'
Substitution 4 → A. Johansson
81'
Substitution 3 → E. Ekong
81'
Substitution 4 → S. Haksabanovic
87'
Yellow Card
87'
Red Card
90+1'
Substitution 5 → L. Tidstrand
90+1'
Substitution 5 → N. Zatterstrom
90+7'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
2Shots on Goal7
12Shots off Goal3
17Total Shots13
3Blocked Shots3
13Shots insidebox12
4Shots outsidebox1
13Fouls14
8Corner Kicks5
1Offsides3
61Ball Possession39
3Yellow Cards2
0Red Cards1
6Goalkeeper Saves1
545Total passes358
464Passes accurate286
85Passes %80
2.36expected_goals1.3
Starting Lineups
Mjallby AIF1:1
Starting XI
1N. TornqvistG
5A. IqbalD
17E. StroudM
19A. MannehF
13J. KiilerichD
10N. RojkjaerM
18J. BergstromF
4A. NorenD
22J. GustavssonM
6L. ThorellF
14H. JohanssonM
Malmo FF1:1
Starting XI
33M. EllborgG
38H. BolinD
40K. BusuladzicM
22T. AliF
25BusanelloD
37A. SkogmarM
9I. KieseF
19C. RoslerD
16O. BergM
17J. StrygerD
2J. KarlssonD
Head-to-Head
4
Wins
4
Draws
7
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Mjallby AIF
Form: W-W-D-W-W
Malmo FF
Form: W-D-L-D-W
Record
8 W
1 D
1 L
•
4 W
3 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
1.9
Scored
vs
1.5
Scored
0.7
Conceded
vs
0.8
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
50%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
30%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:0.3
Away:1.0
Scored
Home:1.5
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:0.3
Away:1.5
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1630
Good
1754
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1748
↑ Momentum (+119)
1798
↑ Momentum (+44)
Expected Outcome
24%
Home Win
28%
Draw
48%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1552
Attack
1635
1647
Defence
1687
Recent Form
1597
Attack
1634
1686
Defence
1710
Post-Match Changes
0
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

