Fri, 1 Aug 2025, 15:15
Full Time

Match Timeline

25'
Sergey Tikhonovskiy🟨
Yellow Card
32'
Nikolay Mirskiy🟨
Yellow Card
46'
A. Svirepa🔄
Substitution 1 → V. Rusenchik
52'
E. Krasnov
Normal Goal → Y. Skibskiy
57'
R. Piletskiy🔄
Substitution 2 → K. Apanasevich
59'
N. Naumov
Normal Goal → E. Krasnov
60'
R. Teverov🔄
Substitution 1 → D. Radikovskiy
65'
D. Radikovskiy
Normal Goal → D. Girs
67'
E. Krasnov
Normal Goal → D. Radikovskiy
70'
V. Rusenchik
Normal Goal → A. Ageev
74'
E. Krasnov🔄
Substitution 2 → R. Lisovskiy
74'
S. Tikhonovskiy🔄
Substitution 3 → M. Kuntsevich
74'
V. Zhumaev🔄
Substitution 4 → D. Pesnyak
76'
P. Pashevich🔄
Substitution 3 → M. Svidinskiy
81'
R. Lisovskiy
Normal Goal → D. Radikovskiy
82'
Victor Sotnikov🟨
Yellow Card

Match Statistics

2Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0

Starting Lineups

Bate BorisovBate Borisov1:1

Starting XI

35A. Skopets1:1
66A. AgeevD
7A. SvirepaM
80N. MirskiyF
23I. RashchenyaD
5E. Osipov3:2
77I. KargboF
15P. PashevichD
47A. SakhonchikM
27R. PiletskiyF
33V. SotnikovD

FC VitebskFC VitebskUnknown

Starting XI

12D. KharitonovG
3V. ZhumaevD
27E. NovykhD
23N. NaumovD
28K. YankovskiyD
18Y. SkibskiyM
20E. KrasnovM
80A. KsenofontovM
26S. TikhonovskiyM
39D. GirsM
9R. TeverovF

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Bate Borisov
Bate Borisov
Form: D-W-L-D-D
FC Vitebsk
FC Vitebsk
Form: D-W-L-D-L
Record
1 W
4 D
5 L
3 W
3 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
1.4
Scored
vs
1.1
Scored
2.3
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
10%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.3
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:3.3
Away:1.7
Scored
Home:1.8
Away:0.7
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.7

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1552
Average
1559
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1492
↓ Momentum (-60)
1624
↑ Momentum (+66)
Expected Outcome
32%
Home Win
35%
Draw
33%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1528
Attack
1477
1527
Defence
1570
Recent Form
1502
Attack
1520
1488
Defence
1554
Post-Match Changes
-16
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.