Sat, 4 Apr 2026, 13:00
1. Lig
Turkey
Full Time
Match Timeline
10'
Normal Goal
12'
Goal confirmed
37'
Yellow Card
43'
Yellow Card
45+1'
Normal Goal → Orhan Ovacıklı
48'
Substitution 1 → Mustafa Fettahoglu
60'
Substitution 1 → Gianni Bruno
70'
Substitution 2 → Cheikne Sylla
70'
Substitution 3 → Adem Eren Kabak
74'
Substitution 2 → Serkan Asan
75'
Substitution 3 → Doğan Erdoğan
80'
Normal Goal
84'
Substitution 4 → Fernando Andrade
84'
Substitution 5 → Mustafa Yumlu
90'
Substitution 4 → Alim Öztürk
90'
Substitution 5 → Ali Yaşar
Match Statistics
8Shots on Goal2
4Shots off Goal5
13Total Shots8
1Blocked Shots1
6Shots insidebox4
7Shots outsidebox4
7Fouls9
5Corner Kicks2
63Ball Possession37
1Yellow Cards1
1Goalkeeper Saves6
559Total passes316
495Passes accurate249
89Passes %79
Starting Lineups
Erzurumspor FK1:1
Starting XI
31Matija OrbanićG
15Guram GiorbelidzeD
6Brandon BaiyeM
65Martín RodríguezM
10Eren TozluF
3Yakup KırtayD
8Sefa AkgünM
4Amar GerxhaliuD
24Giovanni CrociataM
53Orhan OvacıklıD
77Benhur KeserM
Iğdır FK1:1
Starting XI
26Sinan BolatG
77Güray VuralD
23Ali Kaan GünerenM
20Ryan MendesM
55Bengali-Fodé KoitaF
2Robin YalçınD
10Florian LoshajM
7Moryke FofanaM
35Atakan ÇankayaD
17Ahmet EnginM
58Gökcan KayaD
Head-to-Head
2
Wins
1
Draws
1
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Erzurumspor FK
Form: W-W-L-W-W
Iğdır FK
Form: L-D-L-L-D
Record
9 W
0 D
1 L
•
3 W
3 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
3.5
Scored
vs
1.0
Scored
0.7
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
60%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
40%
BTTS
40%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:5.2
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:0.6
Away:0.8
Scored
Home:0.8
Away:1.2
Conceded
Home:2.3
Away:0.7
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1647
Good
1540
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1746
↑ Momentum (+99)
1562
↑ Momentum (+22)
Expected Outcome
46%
Home Win
29%
Draw
25%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1587
Attack
1498
1713
Defence
1581
Recent Form
1680
Attack
1505
1774
Defence
1585
Post-Match Changes
+8
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

