Mon, 16 Mar 2026, 19:45
Full Time

Match Timeline

60'
James Norris🟨
Yellow Card
65'
James Norris🔄
Substitution 1 → Daniel Kelly
65'
Maill Lundgren🔄
Substitution 2 → Alistair Coote
69'
Daniel Kelly🟨
Yellow Card
71'
Jack Henry-Francis🔄
Substitution 3 → Jonathan Lunney
72'
Sean Boyd🔄
Substitution 4 → John Martin
75'
Zane Myers🔄
Substitution 1 → Markuss Strods
75'
Jordan Flores🔄
Substitution 2 → Adam McDonnell
82'
Connor Parsons🔄
Substitution 3 → Harry Vaughan
89'
Harry Wood🔄
Substitution 5 → Rodrigo Freitas

Match Statistics

0Shots on Goal6
3Shots off Goal4
5Total Shots14
2Blocked Shots4
3Shots insidebox6
2Shots outsidebox8
13Fouls8
2Corner Kicks4
3Offsides1
45Ball Possession55
2Yellow Cards0
6Goalkeeper Saves0
398Total passes492
301Passes accurate398
76Passes %81

Starting Lineups

ShelbourneShelbourne1:1

Starting XI

1Wessel SpeelG
18James NorrisD
23Kerr McInroyM
28Maill LundgrenM
9Sean BoydF
4Kameron LedwidgeD
21Jack Henry-FrancisM
7Harry WoodM
24Zeno Ibsen RossiD
27Evan CaffreyM
2Sean GannonD

BohemiansBohemians1:1

Starting XI

1Kacper ChorążkaG
15Senan MullenD
6Jordan FloresM
7Connor ParsonsM
9Colm WhelanF
22Sam ToddD
10Dawson DevoyM
26Ross TierneyM
12Patrick HickeyD
23Zane MyersM
16Darragh PowerD

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Shelbourne
Shelbourne
Form: W-D-L-W-D
Bohemians
Bohemians
Form: W-W-W-W-W
Record
4 W
5 D
1 L
6 W
3 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
1.7
Scored
vs
1.5
Scored
1.2
Conceded
vs
0.6
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
60%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
30%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.7
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.3
Scored
Home:1.0
Away:2.3
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:0.3

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1573
Average
1569
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1577
↑ Momentum (+3)
1617
↑ Momentum (+48)
Expected Outcome
33%
Home Win
35%
Draw
32%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1520
Attack
1538
1599
Defence
1628
Recent Form
1567
Attack
1573
1575
Defence
1662
Post-Match Changes
+0
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.