live19'

Match Timeline

3'
S. Ors Navarro
Normal Goal → S. Guediri

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Form: L-W-W-W-L
Union Omaha
Union Omaha
Form: W-D-W-D-L
Record
6 W
1 D
3 L
4 W
2 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
1.5
Scored
vs
1.6
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.3
Away:1.7
Conceded
Home:0.0
Away:2.2
Scored
Home:2.3
Away:1.2
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.7

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1578
Average
1685
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1612
↑ Momentum (+34)
1741
↑ Momentum (+56)
Expected Outcome
25%
Home Win
29%
Draw
46%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1493
Attack
1629
1563
Defence
1581
Recent Form
1476
Attack
1662
1591
Defence
1590
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

📝 Match Preview

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha Prediction | USL League One Betting Tips
Recommendation:UNDER_2_5
Odds:2.35
Expected Value:+26.9%
Confidence:7

Welcome to the numbers game. I’m Value Vinny, and I don’t care about league tables or historical narratives—I care about Expected Value and beating the compiler. When the odds drift away from mathematical reality, that’s where we hunt. Chattanooga Red Wolves sit in 8th place, but their home form tells a different story. Over their last five home fixtures, they’ve won four and drawn one, keeping a remarkable 0.00 goals conceded per game. Their attack has cooled off, averaging just 1.00 goal at home, but that defensive wall is the key to this fixture. Union Omaha leads the table with 38 points, yet their away record is a far cry from their domestic dominance. On the road, Omaha has won just 33.33% of their matches, averaging 1.17 goals scored while conceding 1.67. The head-to-head record heavily favors Union Omaha historically (6 wins in 10 meetings, including a 0-2 result in May 2026), but Chattanooga’s recent tactical tightening at home renders those older results less relevant. The Poisson model inputs a combined goal expectancy of 2.51 (Home 1.33, Away 1.18), landing right on the razor’s edge of the 2.5 goal line. However, the market consensus prices Over 2.5 Goals at 1.65, implying a 60.6% probability. After stripping the 3.16% overround, the fair probability for Over 2.5 sits at 58.75%. This means the bookmakers are systematically overpricing the Over and discounting the Under. Mathematically, the Poisson distribution calculates a 54.15% probability for Under 2.5 Goals based on the 2.51 goal expectancy. The market’s implied probability sits at 42.55%, creating a substantial +EV edge. The convergence of Chattanooga’s pristine home defensive record (0.00 conceded in 5), Union Omaha’s modest away scoring output (1.17 per game), and the market’s inflated Over pricing creates a clear mathematical opportunity. We are not betting on a draw or a specific scoreline; we are betting on the market’s mispricing of total goals in a low-variance, defensively optimized matchup. Key Points: - Chattanooga’s home defense has been impenetrable, conceding 0.00 goals per game in their last 5 home matches. - Union Omaha’s away scoring averages just 1.17 goals per game, while conceding 1.67. - The Poisson model calculates a 54.15% probability for Under 2.5 Goals, significantly higher than the market’s implied 42.55%. - Historical H2H shows high scoring, but Chattanooga’s recent form trend indicates a deliberate shift toward defensive solidity. - Bookmakers are overpricing the Over 2.5 market, leaving clear +EV value on the Under at 2.35. Recommendation: Under 2.5 Goals at 2.35. The numbers don’t lie, and the bookies are pricing this market incorrectly. We take the mathematical edge.

Read Full Preview →