Sat, 4 Apr 2026, 07:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
9'
Missed Penalty
11'
Yellow Card
13'
Normal Goal
18'
Yellow Card
37'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 → Ryotaro Meshino
46'
Substitution 1 → Fuchi Honda
56'
Substitution 2 → Kyo Sato
61'
Substitution 3 → Ryuma Nakano
61'
Substitution 4 → Alex Souza
65'
Substitution 2 → Shu Kurata
74'
Substitution 3 → Harumi Minamino
74'
Substitution 4 → Tokuma Suzuki
75'
Normal Goal → Riku Handa
76'
Substitution 5 → Taiki Hirato
84'
Yellow Card
85'
Substitution 5 → Shoji Toyama
Match Statistics
9Shots on Goal0
6Shots off Goal3
20Total Shots5
5Blocked Shots2
16Shots insidebox4
4Shots outsidebox1
10Fouls23
5Corner Kicks2
2Offsides2
53Ball Possession47
1Yellow Cards3
1Goalkeeper Saves6
389Total passes354
268Passes accurate250
69Passes %71
Starting Lineups
Gamba Osaka1:1
Starting XI
1Masaaki HigashiguchiG
21Ryo HatsuseD
27Rin MitoM
97WeltonM
23Deniz HümmetF
4Shinnosuke NakataniD
13Shuto AbeM
11Issam JebaliM
5Genta MiuraD
17Ryoya YamashitaM
3Riku HandaD
Kyoto Sanga1:1
Starting XI
1Gakuji OtaG
22Hidehiro SugaiD
18Temma MatsudaM
77Haruki AraiF
34Henrique TrevisanD
25Sung-jun YoonM
11Marco TúlioF
50Yoshinori SuzukiD
6João PedroM
7Masaya OkugawaF
2Shinnosuke FukudaD
Head-to-Head
3
Wins
6
Draws
5
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Gamba Osaka
Form: D-D-L-D-W
Kyoto Sanga
Form: D-W-L-L-W
Record
3 W
6 D
1 L
•
4 W
3 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
1.5
Scored
vs
1.7
Scored
1.4
Conceded
vs
1.1
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
10%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
80%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.6
Away:1.4
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.6
Scored
Home:1.3
Away:2.0
Conceded
Home:1.0
Away:1.2
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1594
Average
1544
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1618
↑ Momentum (+24)
1567
↑ Momentum (+22)
Expected Outcome
39%
Home Win
32%
Draw
29%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1550
Attack
1502
1519
Defence
1586
Recent Form
1580
Attack
1508
1483
Defence
1587
Post-Match Changes
+12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

