Wed, 1 Apr 2026, 10:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
23'
Yellow Card
32'
Normal Goal → Kein Sato
46'
Substitution 1 → Tete Yengi
46'
Substitution 2 → Neta Lavi
56'
Yellow Card
61'
Substitution 1 → Marcelo Ryan
64'
Normal Goal
71'
Substitution 3 → Sang-Ho Na
71'
Substitution 4 → Kanji Kuwayama
75'
Penalty confirmed
77'
Penalty
79'
Substitution 2 → Divine Chinedu Otani
79'
Substitution 3 → Leon Nozawa
79'
Substitution 4 → Kei Koizumi
87'
Substitution 5 → Yuta Sugawara
90'
Substitution 5 → Asahi Masuyama
Match Statistics
3Shots on Goal4
3Shots off Goal1
8Total Shots9
2Blocked Shots4
5Shots insidebox5
3Shots outsidebox4
9Fouls10
3Corner Kicks3
4Offsides1
46Ball Possession54
1Yellow Cards1
1Goalkeeper Saves3
435Total passes515
363Passes accurate432
83Passes %84
Starting Lineups
Machida ZelviaUnknown
Starting XI
1Kosei TaniG
6Henry Heroki MochizukiD
3Gen ShojiD
5Ibrahim DreševićD
88Hotaka NakamuraM
23Ryohei ShirasakiM
19Yuta NakayamaM
26Kotaro HayashiM
8Keiya SentoF
7Yuki SomaF
9Shota FujioF
FC TokyoUnknown
Starting XI
1Hayate TanakaG
2Sei MuroyaD
24Alexander ScholzD
17Hayato InamuraD
42Kento HashimotoD
71Fuki YamadaM
18Kento HashimotoM
27Kyota TokiwaM
22Keita EndoM
16Kein SatoF
39Teruhito NakagawaF
Head-to-Head
3
Wins
2
Draws
2
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Machida Zelvia
Form: D-W-L-W-W
FC Tokyo
Form: D-W-D-W-L
Record
5 W
4 D
1 L
•
4 W
5 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
1.4
Scored
vs
1.5
Scored
1.2
Conceded
vs
1.1
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.5
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:1.5
Away:0.8
Scored
Home:1.7
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:0.8
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1550
Average
1540
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1577
↑ Momentum (+28)
1538
↓ Momentum (-2)
Expected Outcome
34%
Home Win
34%
Draw
32%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1510
Attack
1505
1591
Defence
1585
Recent Form
1512
Attack
1508
1577
Defence
1622
Post-Match Changes
-13
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

