Fri, 22 May 2026, 19:00
Primera División
Chile
Full Time
Match Timeline
-5'
Red Card
37'
Yellow Card
37'
Yellow Card
42'
Substitution 1 → P. Rodriguez
55'
Yellow Card
57'
Normal Goal → F. Salinas
59'
Substitution 1 → N. Baeza
59'
Substitution 2 → E. M. Ramos Aviles
59'
Substitution 3 → J. Alfaro
60'
Substitution 2 → C. Zavala
60'
Substitution 3 → B. Chandia
69'
Substitution 4 → L. Pratto
69'
Substitution 5 → G. Vadala
78'
Substitution 4 → N. Montiel
82'
Yellow Card
88'
Yellow Card
89'
Yellow Card
90'
Normal Goal
90+3'
Yellow Card
90+6'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
2Shots on Goal4
4Shots off Goal7
6Total Shots12
0Blocked Shots1
2Shots insidebox8
4Shots outsidebox4
10Fouls9
5Corner Kicks7
1Offsides0
52Ball Possession48
5Yellow Cards3
1Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves2
396Total passes363
319Passes accurate255
81Passes %70
Starting Lineups
Everton de Vina1:1
Starting XI
25E. Kirkman1:1
15V. FernandezD
29B. MartinezM
35L. SotoF
22S. LondonoF
24D. OyarzunD
7J. MoyaM
37V. VidalD
21B. BerriosM
2O. Opazo LaraD
10A. MedinaM
Coquimbo Unido1:1
Starting XI
1G. FloresG
28S. CabreraD
7S. GalaniM
20M. A. Mundaca Barraza4:1
3M. FernandezD
8A. CamargoM
9N. JohansenF
4E. HernandezD
6D. GlabyM
27L. RiverosF
17F. SalinasD
Head-to-Head
5
Wins
5
Draws
5
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Everton de Vina
Form: W-L-D-W-D
Coquimbo Unido
Form: W-W-W-D-W
Record
3 W
3 D
4 L
•
6 W
2 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
1.2
Scored
vs
1.7
Scored
1.1
Conceded
vs
1.1
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
40%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.2
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.0
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:0.7
Away:1.8
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1486
Average
1639
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1471
↓ Momentum (-15)
1692
↑ Momentum (+53)
Expected Outcome
21%
Home Win
27%
Draw
52%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1406
Attack
1541
1581
Defence
1623
Recent Form
1370
Attack
1576
1624
Defence
1608
Post-Match Changes
+4
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

