Thu, 14 May 2026, 00:00
Full Time

Match Timeline

40'
B. Barjolo🟨
Yellow Card
52'
C. Griffith
Normal Goal
58'
B. Barjolo🔄
Substitution 1 → N. Santos
58'
L. Fernandez-Kim🔄
Substitution 2 → M. Kissel
60'
D. Cervantes
Normal Goal → M. Kissel
62'
M. Harwood🔄
Substitution 1 → J. Friedman
63'
K. Michel🔄
Substitution 2 → T. Putt
69'
E. Izoita🟨
Yellow Card
71'
C. Ferguson🟨
Yellow Card
72'
D. Cervantes🔄
Substitution 3 → C. Cruthers
72'
C. Griffith🔄
Substitution 4 → D. Nunez
77'
S. Vigilante
Normal Goal → D. Randell
81'
C. Ferguson🔄
Substitution 5 → H. Mueller
85'
L. Pechota🔄
Substitution 3 → H. Cruz

Starting Lineups

Portland Timbers IIPortland Timbers IIUnknown

Starting XI

91S. JosephUnknown
44A. BamfordUnknown
61N. LundUnknown
94C. OndoUnknown
53C. FergusonUnknown
73E. IzoitaUnknown
46V. EnriquezUnknown
77B. BarjoloUnknown
35L. Fernandez-KimUnknown
39C. GriffithUnknown
47D. CervantesUnknown

Minnesota United IIMinnesota United IIUnknown

Starting XI

94K. RizvanovichUnknown
35P. TarnueUnknown
92A. KabiaUnknown
31N. DangUnknown
59J. FarrisUnknown
50M. HarwoodUnknown
90L. PechotaUnknown
95S. VigilanteUnknown
14K. MichelUnknown
22M. CaldeiraUnknown
17D. RandellUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
Form: D-W-D-W-D
Minnesota United II
Minnesota United II
Form: L-D-W-W-L
Record
5 W
4 D
1 L
4 W
1 D
5 L
Goals Per Game
1.5
Scored
vs
1.0
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
40%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.5
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.5
Scored
Home:0.3
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:0.7
Away:1.6

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1507
Average
1519
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1540
↑ Momentum (+33)
1545
↑ Momentum (+26)
Expected Outcome
32%
Home Win
34%
Draw
34%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1524
Attack
1483
1504
Defence
1536
Recent Form
1514
Attack
1443
1531
Defence
1586
Post-Match Changes
+12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.