Sat, 30 May 2026, 05:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
9'
Substitution 1 → So Kawahara
11'
Normal Goal → Taishi Matsumoto
20'
Normal Goal → Akito Suzuki
35'
Yellow Card
40'
Goal cancelled
43'
Normal Goal
67'
Substitution 1 → Kinoshita Kosuke
67'
Substitution 2 → Yotaro Nakajima
69'
Substitution 2 → Ryuki Osa
69'
Substitution 3 → Lazar Romanić
69'
Substitution 4 → Kazuya Konno
78'
Substitution 3 → Chajima Yusuke
88'
Substitution 4 → Maeda Naoki
88'
Substitution 5 → Soma Kanda
Match Statistics
7Shots on Goal3
8Shots off Goal5
18Total Shots10
3Blocked Shots2
13Shots insidebox7
5Shots outsidebox3
11Fouls6
5Corner Kicks2
1Offsides1
46Ball Possession54
0Yellow Cards1
2Goalkeeper Saves5
422Total passes501
321Passes accurate405
76Passes %81
Starting Lineups
Sanfrecce Hiroshima1:1
Starting XI
99Issei OuchiG
19Sasaki ShoD
24Higashi ShunkiM
39Sota NakamuraF
10Akito SuzukiF
3Yamasaki TaichiD
14Taishi MatsumotoM
11Kato MutsukiF
15Shuto NakanoD
6Kawabe HayaoM
13Arai NaotoM
Kawasaki Frontale1:1
Starting XI
1Louis YamaguchiG
13Sota MiuraD
6Yuki YamamotoM
23MarcinhoM
20Kyosuke MochiyamaF
28Yuichi MaruyamaD
8Kento TachibanadaM
14Yasuto WakizakaM
2Yuto MatsunaganeD
17Tatsuya ItoM
29Reon YamaharaD
Head-to-Head
11
Wins
6
Draws
13
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Form: W-W-W-D-L
Kawasaki Frontale
Form: W-D-L-W-L
Record
5 W
3 D
2 L
•
5 W
1 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
1.7
Scored
vs
1.2
Scored
0.9
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.7
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.0
Away:0.8
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:1.0
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.4
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1622
Good
1596
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1630
↑ Momentum (+8)
1579
↓ Momentum (-16)
Expected Outcome
36%
Home Win
33%
Draw
31%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1527
Attack
1600
1607
Defence
1502
Recent Form
1529
Attack
1581
1594
Defence
1520
Post-Match Changes
+10
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

