Mon, 8 Jun 2026, 16:00
Friendlies
World
Full Time
Match Timeline
15'
Normal Goal
46'
Substitution 1 β T. Moi
46'
Substitution 1 β U. Happonen
46'
Substitution 2 β J. Paananen
51'
Penalty
60'
Substitution 3 β A. Puukko
60'
Substitution 4 β O. Haggstrom
60'
Substitution 5 β E. Levealahti
60'
Substitution 6 β J. Korkko
60'
Substitution 7 β J. Kilo
60'
Substitution 8 β D. Armstrong
60'
Substitution 9 β O. Ruoppi
60'
Substitution 10 β D. Ezeh
61'
Substitution 2 β H. Skogvold
61'
Substitution 3 β D. Jakobsen
61'
Substitution 4 β M. Broholm
61'
Substitution 5 β J. Hansen
61'
Substitution 6 β R. Norheim
61'
Substitution 7 β B. Hegland
61'
Substitution 8 β N. Wassberg
76'
Substitution 9 β J. Norbye
77'
Yellow Card
Starting Lineups
Norway U21Unknown
Starting XI
1M. BorsheimUnknown
6M. RiisnaesUnknown
5E. Fauske HellandUnknown
13R. HoltenUnknown
2O. BraudeUnknown
15N. OdegardUnknown
8J. Hjerto-DahlUnknown
7S. NypanUnknown
22N. FuglestadUnknown
20K. LonebuUnknown
17E. AustboUnknown
Finland U21Unknown
Starting XI
12A. PiispaUnknown
22M. YlitolvaUnknown
21I. KangasniemiUnknown
15O. VaistoUnknown
3E. TurkkiUnknown
10J. TauriainenUnknown
6M. SiltanenUnknown
18L. MollerUnknown
20O. LiimattaUnknown
11M. SoderbackUnknown
9O. HelenUnknown
Head-to-Head
3
Wins
0
Draws
2
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Norway U21
Form: L-W-W-W-W
Finland U21
Form: W-W-W-D-W
Record
6 W
1 D
3 L
β’
6 W
2 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
2.1
Scored
vs
3.1
Scored
1.5
Conceded
vs
0.7
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
60%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
30%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:3.0
Away:1.2
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:1.6
Scored
Home:2.4
Away:3.8
Conceded
Home:0.4
Away:1.0
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1500
Average
1500
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1500
β Stable
1500
β Stable
Expected Outcome
33%
Home Win
34%
Draw
33%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1500
Attack
1500
1500
Defence
1505
Recent Form
1500
Attack
1500
1500
Defence
1510
Post-Match Changes
-12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

