Wed, 5 Aug 2026, 17:00
Full Time
4:1
HT: 1 - 1

Match Timeline

5'
R. Gaugere
Normal Goal → M. Oi
22'
M. Rahimova🟨
Yellow Card
24'
M. Schultz
Normal Goal
54'
W. Mitani🔄
Substitution 1 → K. Vilau
57'
K. Z. Brima🟨
Yellow Card
61'
R. Madsen🔄
Substitution 1 → N. Nadim
66'
C. Paulson🔄
Substitution 2 → E. Oskarsdottir
66'
C. Korhonen🔄
Substitution 3 → S. Thygesen
70'
N. Nadim
Normal Goal → S. Markvardsen
79'
S. Thygesen
Normal Goal → K. Carusa
82'
N. Preijere🔄
Substitution 2 → S. Senberga
82'
L. Kallase🔄
Substitution 3 → I. Krasnova
86'
M. Rahimova🔄
Substitution 4 → T. Camane
86'
M. Oi🔄
Substitution 5 → A. Belova
87'
Z. Witek🔄
Substitution 4 → A. Termansen
87'
L. M. Hermann🔄
Substitution 5 → S. Jones
90+2'
N. Taketa
Own Goal

Starting Lineups

Køge WKøge WUnknown

Starting XI

66L. KozalUnknown
3M. SchultzUnknown
2M. UhreUnknown
28S. BoyeUnknown
19S. MarkvardsenUnknown
13C. PaulsonUnknown
88Z. WitekUnknown
24L. M. HermannUnknown
11C. KorhonenUnknown
7K. CarusaUnknown
17R. MadsenUnknown

Riga WRiga WUnknown

Starting XI

1A. TorgosovaUnknown
39N. TaketaUnknown
19R. GaugereUnknown
28M. RahimovaUnknown
49M. OiUnknown
80S. KatoUnknown
11M. TakahiraUnknown
2L. KallaseUnknown
10K. Z. BrimaUnknown
17N. PreijereUnknown
23W. MitaniUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Køge W
Køge W
Form: W-W-W-W-W
Riga W
Riga W
Form: W-W-L-W
Record
8 W
1 D
1 L
3 W
0 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
2.1
Scored
vs
3.3
Scored
0.4
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
60%
Clean Sheets
0%
BTTS
30%
BTTS
100%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:2.2
Conceded
Home:0.4
Away:0.4
Scored
Home:4.0
Away:3.0
Conceded
Home:1.0
Away:1.3

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1500
Average
1513
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1500
→ Stable
1533
↑ Momentum (+20)
Expected Outcome
32%
Home Win
34%
Draw
34%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1500
Attack
1515
1500
Defence
1510
Recent Form
1500
Attack
1532
1500
Defence
1522
Post-Match Changes
+13
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.